For the purposes of this article we will divide intelligence into
two categories: reactive and proactive.
Reactive intelligence is a pre-programmed or instinctive
response to the environment and proactive intelligence is a
learned response to the environment.
The responses of organisms to their environment range from
almost totally instinctive to almost totally learned.
The behavior of the “lower” life forms is the most instinctive
and the behavior of the “higher” life forms is almost totally
learned.
Each organism has its own way of understanding its
environment but the goal remains the same: the ability to
forecast the immediate future quickly and accurately.
Intelligence, simply defined, is the ability to know what comes
next.
If intelligence is not the ability to do this, then what is it?
If intelligence cannot do this then of what use is it?
Do not doubt that all living things have intelligence to some
degree.
Intelligence and life: one is not possible without the other and
all species of living things have the requisite intelligence
necessary to flourish.
We normally think of predatory animals as simply running
down their prey and overpowering it but there is far more to
successful hunting than that.
Finding prey and killing it is matter of being at the right place
at the right time.
This is not so easy as evidenced by the low success rate of
predators.
To successfully prey, predators must anticipate the behavior of
the prey and formulate a plan of attack.
This is extraordinary when you think of it.
The predator must have sufficient knowledge of the prey’s
habits to be able to predict their movements (memory and
spatial reasoning), must know the geographical features of
the land (memory and pattern recognition), must select the
most advantageous ambush point (spatial reasoning), and
must do all this in a timely fashion (analytical ability).
And as if these attributes were not enough, hunting is often
performed by a group that relies on an coordinated effort.
I have no idea how they do this.
I don't know how they mutually form a plan and assign the
individual duties and communicate the plan to each other.
Nonetheless, they do it and all of this is not only suggestive of
a high intelligence but of an even more effective coordinated
collective intelligence.
Prey animals do not have the predator’s burden.
They are reactive rather than proactive and, one concludes -
because of the evolutionary axiom that abilities are developed
according to need - that their intelligence has no need to
further develop and so has remained at a significantly lower
level.
In fact, one is left to conclude that, however unpalatable it
may seem, predatory behavior is the driving force behind the
evolution of intelligence and organisation.

No comments:
Post a Comment